Organizer platform
Pricing depends on event size, selected services and optional features. Whova directs organizers to request a quote.
Check current pricing →Whova is an event management platform for registration, event apps, networking, virtual sessions, sponsor management and post-event reporting.
Whova combines registration, event websites, mobile apps, agenda tools, networking, virtual sessions, exhibitor tools and analytics. G2 and Capterra both report 4.8 out of 5 ratings, while official pricing is quote-based.
This profile combines documented product information and independent evidence where available. It is not a hands-on test unless TechZella explicitly identifies one.
A quick way to understand who this product may suit, where its limits matter, and which facts are most relevant before you compare alternatives.
Android, API, iOS, Web
8.6/10
Whova is an event management platform for planning, promoting and operating in-person, hybrid and virtual events. Its product combines organizer tools with a branded attendee app and web portal.
The platform supports registration, event websites, agendas, speaker management, abstract submissions, check-in, attendee networking, sponsor and exhibitor management, virtual sessions and post-event reporting.
Whova was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in San Diego, California. Its event app is available through iOS, Android and web browsers.
Pricing depends on event size, selected services and optional features. Whova directs organizers to request a quote.
Check current pricing →Attendees can download and use the Whova mobile app or web portal for events managed by organizers.
Check current pricing →Whova states that organizers can request a trial account through its demo process.
Check current pricing →Pricing may change. Verify current plans on the vendor's website.
Compare similar products directly, then see which alternatives may make more sense when your requirements differ.
These products address broadly similar requirements. The descriptions focus on documented reasons a buyer might compare them with Whova.
| Deployment | Cloud-based SaaS |
|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS and Android |
| Event formats | In-person, hybrid and virtual |
| Pricing model | Custom quote |
| Free attendee access | Yes |
| Free organizer plan | Not publicly listed |
| Free trial | Trial account available on request |
| API | API and integration access referenced; public standalone developer documentation not located |
| Integrations | HubSpot, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Webex, Mailchimp, Zapier, Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook and others |
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States |
A proprietary editorial score based on product capabilities, usability, value, performance, support and user sentiment evidence.
Whova combines registration, event websites, mobile apps, agenda tools, networking, virtual sessions, exhibitor tools and analytics. G2 and Capterra both report 4.8 out of 5 ratings, while official pricing is quote-based.
Methodology v1.0. The assessment weighs feature coverage (25%), ease of use (15%), value for money (20%), performance (15%), support (10%) and user sentiment (15%), using researched product evidence and verified review evidence where available. It is a TechZella editorial assessment, not a direct user-review average.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
Please log in to submit a review.
The attendee app is free to download and use. Event organizers pay for Whova services, with pricing based on event size and selected features.
Whova states that organizers can request a trial account through its demo process. A permanent free organizer plan was not identified.
Attendees can use native iOS and Android apps or a web browser. Organizers manage events through Whova’s online platform.
Listed integrations include HubSpot, MemberClicks, iMIS, YourMembership, Glue Up, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Webex, YouTube, Vimeo, Wistia, GoTo, Zapier, Mailchimp, Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, Apple Wallet, Google Wallet, Apple Pay and Google Pay.
Whova references APIs and documented integration endpoints in its terms and integration workflows. Public standalone developer documentation was not located in the reviewed sources.