Credits are shared across product surfaces, and a phone reveal costs five credits.
API, extension, and Workspace use draw from the same pool, so teams should estimate usage across workflows rather than per interface.
Evidence source ↗
Lusha is a B2B prospecting and sales-intelligence platform for finding business contact details, enriching records, and routing data into sales workflows.
The assessment reflects documented prospecting, enrichment, integrations, API access, published plans, and public review-page ratings. It is not based on hands-on testing.
This profile combines documented product information and independent evidence where available. It is not a hands-on test unless TechZella explicitly identifies one.
Lusha is a B2B prospecting and sales-intelligence product. It helps teams find business contact details and company information, enrich records, and move prospect data into sales workflows.
Users can work in its cloud Workspace, browser extension, API, or supported CRM integrations. A shared credit balance applies across product surfaces, so usage should be estimated across the whole team.
A quick way to understand who this product may suit, where its limits matter, and which facts are most relevant before you compare alternatives.
Sales, recruiting, and revenue teams that need business contact discovery and enrichment through a browser extension, CRM connections, or API.
Teams expecting unrestricted API access on entry plans, very high-volume phone reveals on a small credit allowance, or full per-user credit controls below Scale should compare plan limits and usage first, and should evaluate alternatives such as Apollo.io or Seamless.AI instead.
API, ChatGPT, Chrome extension, SaaS, Web
7.7/10
These are the product-specific differences that may matter when deciding whether the software fits your workflow. They are based on documented evidence rather than a universal ranking.
These are documented constraints or practical friction points that may matter before you adopt the product.
API, extension, and Workspace use draw from the same pool, so teams should estimate usage across workflows rather than per interface.
Evidence source ↗A low-cost plan may not support production-scale enrichment even though API access is listed.
Evidence source ↗Teams should plan exports and remaining-credit use before the transition.
Evidence source ↗40 credits per month and one seat; permanent plan with no credit card required.
Check current pricing →4,800 credits per year and one included seat.
Check current pricing →7,200 credits per year and two included seats; API, CSV enrichment, signals, and webhooks are listed.
Check current pricing →40,800 credits per year and five included seats; includes API Advanced, team management, and credit allocation.
Check current pricing →Custom credits and seats, with SSO and priority support listed.
Check current pricing →Pricing may change. Verify current plans on the vendor's website.
Compare similar products directly, then see which alternatives may make more sense when your requirements differ.
| Decision factor | Lusha | Apollo.io | Seamless.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free plan plus paid annual-billed plans; Starter is listed at $37.45 per month when billed yearly. | Free plan plus annual-billed per-seat plans; Basic is listed at $49 per seat per month when billed annually. Source ↗ | Free tier with 50 credits; paid Pro pricing is quote-based on its pricing page. Source ↗ |
| Credit allowance | Free includes 40 credits per month; email reveals cost one credit and phone reveals cost five. | Free includes 900 credits per seat per year, granted monthly. Source ↗ | Free includes 50 credits; its pricing page describes credits as used when researching a contact. Source ↗ |
| Platform scope | Contact and company data, enrichment, buying signals, and sales workflows through Workspace, extension, API, and integrations. | Lead discovery, pipeline management, AI-supported prospecting, and campaign workflows are included in Apollo's platform description. Source ↗ | Prospecting, contact research, enrichment, API, and optional add-ons for buyer intent and automation. Source ↗ |
Only factors supported by the available research are shown. The comparison is descriptive, not a ranking.
These products address broadly similar requirements. The descriptions focus on documented reasons a buyer might compare them with Lusha.
| Delivery | Cloud Workspace, browser extension, and API |
|---|---|
| Free plan allowance | 40 credits per month |
| Email reveal cost | 1 credit |
| Phone reveal cost | 5 credits |
| API availability | All plans; strict rate limits on Free and Starter |
| Native CRM integrations | Salesforce and HubSpot |
| Data export | CSV export is a paid feature |
Verified installation, hosting, administration, or environment details that can affect implementation.
| Installation or hosting | Cloud-based Workspace with a browser extension, API, and hosted MCP access; no self-hosted deployment option was verified. Source ↗ |
|---|
Documented portability, standards, export, or switching considerations. No switching-cost score is shown unless the evidence supports one.
CSV export is available as a paid feature; Lusha advises exporting lists before cancellation.
Evidence source ↗A proprietary editorial score based on product capabilities, usability, value, performance, support and user sentiment evidence.
The assessment reflects documented prospecting, enrichment, integrations, API access, published plans, and public review-page ratings. It is not based on hands-on testing.
Methodology v1.0. The assessment weighs feature coverage (25%), ease of use (15%), value for money (20%), performance (15%), support (10%) and user sentiment (15%), using researched product evidence and verified review evidence where available. It is a TechZella editorial assessment, not a direct user-review average.
Key claims are linked to the sources used to verify them. This evidence record is separate from third-party user ratings.
TechZella evaluates software using documented product capabilities, pricing information, usability and value considerations, independent user evidence where available, and competitive context. The assessment is an editorial review, not a hands-on test unless one is explicitly identified. Our editorial assessment is based on 4 documented sources.
The company's FAQ identifies the founders and founding year.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-30The official pricing page lists the plans and their plan-level features.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-30The official FAQ states both unit costs and explains shared credit use across product surfaces.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-30Lusha's Salesforce integration page describes exports, existing-record enrichment, and field mapping.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-30The G2 seller page displayed its average rating and review count.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-30The official FAQ states that the free plan does not expire and requires no credit card.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-30Answers begin with the clearest available response, followed by the context that helps you act on it.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
Please log in to submit a review.