The API quick-start page says it was updated about five years ago.
Older documentation may not reflect current endpoints, access terms, or service availability.
Evidence source ↗Spyse was an internet-asset search service for cybersecurity research, exposing data about domains, IP addresses, certificates, and related infrastructure. Current service availability and pricing could not be verified.
Historical API documentation describes asset search, token authentication, a CLI, SDKs, and integrations. The product site was inaccessible during research, so current operation, pricing, performance, and support could not be confirmed.
This profile combines documented product information and independent evidence where available. It is not a hands-on test unless TechZella explicitly identifies one.
Spyse was an internet-asset search service intended for cybersecurity research. Historical documentation describes searches across domains, IP addresses, DNS and WHOIS records, certificates, and related infrastructure.
The product does not fit the requested Web Scraping category. It focused on searchable internet-infrastructure data rather than extracting arbitrary website content. The current product website was inaccessible during research, and current service availability could not be confirmed.
A quick way to understand who this product may suit, where its limits matter, and which facts are most relevant before you compare alternatives.
Historically, security analysts and developers researching publicly visible internet infrastructure through search and API workflows.
Buyers needing a currently confirmed service, active support, published current pricing, or a verified web-scraping product should consider other tools, and should evaluate alternatives such as Shodan or Censys instead.
API, CLI, REST API, Web
5.3/10
These are the product-specific differences that may matter when deciding whether the software fits your workflow. They are based on documented evidence rather than a universal ranking.
These are documented constraints or practical friction points that may matter before you adopt the product.
Older documentation may not reflect current endpoints, access terms, or service availability.
Evidence source ↗Buyers should not assume they can create accounts, obtain API credentials, or receive support.
Evidence source ↗For security-sensitive software, TechZella focuses on documented architecture, authentication, data handling, deployment and privacy details that can affect a buying decision. This is product research, not an independent security audit.
| Authentication | Bearer token documented historically |
|---|
Security claims are presented only when supported by documented sources. The presence of this section does not constitute a penetration test, certification or independent security audit.
Current pricing could not be verified. The API documentation points to a pricing page but does not provide plan amounts, and the product website was inaccessible during research. No current free trial or free-tier availability was confirmed.
| Product focus | Internet-asset intelligence for cybersecurity research |
|---|---|
| API | REST API documented historically; current availability unverified |
| Authentication | Bearer token documented historically |
| Free trial | Not currently verified |
| Integrations | Historical documentation lists SpiderFoot, Amass, theHarvester, Subfinder, IntelOwl, Sudomy, Mihari, Sputnik, and Mitaka |
| Service status | Current availability unverified; product website inaccessible during research |
Shodan is a comparable internet-connected-device search service. Censys documents internet-wide search as well as a separate attack-surface-management product. Netlas documents internet scanning, DNS and WHOIS collections, search tools, and an API. These products are active references for buyers, not verified replacements with identical coverage.
A proprietary editorial score based on product capabilities, usability, value, performance, support and user sentiment evidence.
Historical API documentation describes asset search, token authentication, a CLI, SDKs, and integrations. The product site was inaccessible during research, so current operation, pricing, performance, and support could not be confirmed.
Methodology v1.0. The assessment weighs feature coverage (25%), ease of use (15%), value for money (20%), performance (15%), support (10%) and user sentiment (15%), using researched product evidence and verified review evidence where available. It is a TechZella editorial assessment, not a direct user-review average.
Key claims are linked to the sources used to verify them. This evidence record is separate from third-party user ratings.
TechZella evaluates software using documented product capabilities, pricing information, usability and value considerations, independent user evidence where available, and competitive context. The assessment is an editorial review, not a hands-on test unless one is explicitly identified. Our editorial assessment is based on 2 documented sources.
The quick-start page shows a bearer-token request to a domain data endpoint.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-08The quick-start page lists these developer tools and identifies Ruby as a community SDK.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-08These names appear in the API documentation's integrations list.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-08The official domain could not be opened through the research tool; Crunchbase's profile labels the company closed. This does not independently establish the precise shutdown date or present API status.
View source ↗Verified 2026-10-08Answers begin with the clearest available response, followed by the context that helps you act on it.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
Please log in to submit a review.